Najmniej popularne cytaty
#3847 Dodano: 26-08-2010 10:54. Głosów: 54
Don't argue with a Mobius strip because it will be one-sided
#290 Dodano: 20-05-2009 08:04. Głosów: 54
Największy komplement od informatyka: "Mała, jesteś czuła jak laserowa myszka Logitecha!"
#5441 Dodano: 26-10-2011 01:39. Głosów: 54
"Perl users were unable to write programs more accurately than those using a language designed with syntax chosen randomly from the ASCII table"
#2124 Dodano: 25-09-2009 12:48. Głosów: 54
Nie wystarczy myśleć obiektywnie, trzeba myśleć obiektowo.
#354 Dodano: 21-05-2009 06:08. Głosów: 54
Kobieta zmienną jest
#7012 Dodano: 03-09-2013 13:10. Głosów: 54
\n Represents a line break that was inserted with the Shift+Enter key combination. To change a line break into a paragraph break, enter \n in the Search for and Replace with boxes, and then perform a search and replace.
\n in the Search for text box stands for a line break that was inserted with the Shift+Enter key combination.
\n in the Replace with text box stands for a paragraph break that can be entered with the Enter or Return key.
~ z opisu wyrażeń regularnych LibreOffice'a https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/List_of_Regular_Expressions
\n in the Search for text box stands for a line break that was inserted with the Shift+Enter key combination.
\n in the Replace with text box stands for a paragraph break that can be entered with the Enter or Return key.
~ z opisu wyrażeń regularnych LibreOffice'a https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/List_of_Regular_Expressions
#5222 Dodano: 10-08-2011 18:46. Głosów: 54
/* --NOTE--
*
* All this code is called by child process, so debug*() won't work.
* Don't waste time trying it.
*/
*
* All this code is called by child process, so debug*() won't work.
* Don't waste time trying it.
*/
#6400 Dodano: 21-11-2012 09:27. Głosów: 55
<obecalp> How do you do generic programming in Haskell?
<ShreevatsaR> This is a joke, right? This is like asking how you can have precise control over everything in assembly :P
(za http://stackoverflow.com/questions/377093/)
<ShreevatsaR> This is a joke, right? This is like asking how you can have precise control over everything in assembly :P
(za http://stackoverflow.com/questions/377093/)
#4628 Dodano: 26-02-2011 17:17. Głosów: 55
Q: Is there some way to tell Visual Studio 2008 to build the same executable VC6 does? Something that just runs?
A: No, because "just runs" is apparently a dirty word to some folks at
Microsoft. I've said this before that the deploy instructions for
HelloWorld.exe should be *no* longer than the source code for said
project (5 lines). However, MS has some fantasy that everyone will (1)
memorize their instructions about manifests buried deep in the bowels
of MSDN, and (2) use their obtuse installer technology and manage
every last little bit.
[Znalezione na Google Groups]
A: No, because "just runs" is apparently a dirty word to some folks at
Microsoft. I've said this before that the deploy instructions for
HelloWorld.exe should be *no* longer than the source code for said
project (5 lines). However, MS has some fantasy that everyone will (1)
memorize their instructions about manifests buried deep in the bowels
of MSDN, and (2) use their obtuse installer technology and manage
every last little bit.
[Znalezione na Google Groups]
#7001 Dodano: 03-09-2013 13:09. Głosów: 55
Recovery/external programming
Ok, you fucked things up, but on the other hand this will give you the oppotunity to learn external chip-programming, so cheer-up.
http://www.coreboot.org/Chromebooks
Ok, you fucked things up, but on the other hand this will give you the oppotunity to learn external chip-programming, so cheer-up.
http://www.coreboot.org/Chromebooks
#7536 Dodano: 01-08-2014 11:51. Głosów: 55
Log level definitions:
Debug: Shows everything and is likely not suitable for normal production operation due to the sheer size of logs generated
Info: Usually indicates successful service start/stop, versions and such non-error related data
Audit: (An OpenStack invented, level, still not sure what we should be doing with it)
Warning: Indicates that there might be a systemic issue; potential predictive failure notice
(...)
Source: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LoggingStandards
Debug: Shows everything and is likely not suitable for normal production operation due to the sheer size of logs generated
Info: Usually indicates successful service start/stop, versions and such non-error related data
Audit: (An OpenStack invented, level, still not sure what we should be doing with it)
Warning: Indicates that there might be a systemic issue; potential predictive failure notice
(...)
Source: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LoggingStandards
#7289 Dodano: 29-01-2014 11:53. Głosów: 55
Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon.
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
#6172 Dodano: 31-07-2012 15:30. Głosów: 56
drahe: #! is called "shebang" because it's the only "she" coders can bang
#5723 Dodano: 16-01-2012 11:55. Głosów: 56
We have an opening for a part time Linux server administrator. You should dream in shell code and be able to type in vi backwards in your sleep.
#7027 Dodano: 14-09-2013 23:11. Głosów: 56
> How about a sysctl that does "for the love of kbaek, don't ever kill these
> processes when OOM. If nothing else can be killed, I'd rather you panic"?
An aircraft company discovered that it was cheaper to fly its planes
with less fuel on board. The planes would be lighter and use less fuel
and money was saved. On rare occasions however the amount of fuel was
insufficient, and the plane would crash. This problem was solved by
the engineers of the company by the development of a special OOF
(out-of-fuel) mechanism. In emergency cases a passenger was selected
and thrown out of the plane. (When necessary, the procedure was
repeated.) A large body of theory was developed and many publications
were devoted to the problem of properly selecting the victim to be
ejected. Should the victim be chosen at random? Or should one choose
the heaviest person? Or the oldest? Should passengers pay in order not
to be ejected, so that the victim would be the poorest on board? And
if for example the heaviest person was chosen, should there be a
special exception in case that was the pilot? Should first class
passengers be exempted? Now that the OOF mechanism existed, it would
be activated every now and then, and eject passengers even when there
was no fuel shortage. The engineers are still studying precisely how
this malfunction is caused.
> processes when OOM. If nothing else can be killed, I'd rather you panic"?
An aircraft company discovered that it was cheaper to fly its planes
with less fuel on board. The planes would be lighter and use less fuel
and money was saved. On rare occasions however the amount of fuel was
insufficient, and the plane would crash. This problem was solved by
the engineers of the company by the development of a special OOF
(out-of-fuel) mechanism. In emergency cases a passenger was selected
and thrown out of the plane. (When necessary, the procedure was
repeated.) A large body of theory was developed and many publications
were devoted to the problem of properly selecting the victim to be
ejected. Should the victim be chosen at random? Or should one choose
the heaviest person? Or the oldest? Should passengers pay in order not
to be ejected, so that the victim would be the poorest on board? And
if for example the heaviest person was chosen, should there be a
special exception in case that was the pilot? Should first class
passengers be exempted? Now that the OOF mechanism existed, it would
be activated every now and then, and eject passengers even when there
was no fuel shortage. The engineers are still studying precisely how
this malfunction is caused.