What non malicious uses are there for ping's flood (-f) option?

You can watch the dots from across the room while wiggling the cables to find the faulty connection.

http://askubuntu.com/questions/592390/what-non-malicious-uses-are-there-for-pings-flood-f-option

<Rev> Przeglądam wczoraj poprawki w STL w Visual Studio. Jedna z nich:
* rename("test.txt", "test.txt") is required to be a no-op, but we were deleting the file

I almost always leave with the impression that the designers did the “right thing.” I suppose this is in contrast to Java, which does the pedantic thing, Perl, which does the kludgy thing, Ruby, which has two independent implementations of the wrong thing, and C, which doesn't do anything.

quote from evanmiller.org, erlang programmer's homepage

However, when I type this code:

if(sectionID == currentSectionID)

into my editor and run static analysis, I get: "JAVA0078 Floating point values compared with =="


//indeksowanie floatem...
//http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1088216/whats-wrong-with-using-to-compare-floats-in-java

orson@deepblue:~$ man jpnevulator
(...)
-j, --fuck-up
This is the special fuck up option. When the calculation of a
checksum is choosen (see checksum and crc* options) the checkum
will be crippled on purpose. Carefully named after the special
Jan Arie de Bruin 'fuck up crc' button.

Meanwhile in Java...
ReevaluateProvidersAfterTaskLanguageSpecializationChangeEventConsumer

Kumpel: a mozna bylo uzyc skrotu RPATLSCEC

ze strony jmonkeyengine.org:
"If you are a psychic Java guru with the ability to masterfully comprehend brand new APIs without any documentation what so ever, then you won’t have to read our wiki."

And why the hell was this marked for stable even *IF* it hadn't been
complete and utter tripe? It even has a comment in the commit message
about how this probably doesn't matter. So it's doubly crap: it's
*wrong*, and it didn't actually fix anything to begin with.

There aren't enough swear-words in the English language, so now I'll
have to call you perkeleen vittupää just to express my disgust and
frustration with this crap.

Linus

man tcpdump - this option is intended to get around serious brain damage in Suns NIS server — usually it hangs forever translating non-local internet numbers

Przychodzi kąt do lekarza, a lekarz mówi: Kto pana tak skierował?

Authorities in India are investigating how Hanuman, the monkey god, has been issued a biometric identity card. - BBC News

Komentarz w corze Drupala

// This is a lousy test, but don't know how else to confirm it is a theme.

"Most languages are detected by their file extension. This is the fastest and most common situation. For script files, which are usually extensionless, we do "deep content inspection"™ and check the shebang of the file."
(https://github.com/github/linguist)

This is the simplest way to create a DACL.
Use ConvertStringSecurityDescriptorToSecurityDescriptor,
Function takes a string in a format called SDDL specifying the ACL.
Writing SCs will be achivabe by creating DACL's with SDDL.

Very simple code will illustrate this tool:

SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES security;
ZeroMemory(&security, sizeof(security));

security.nLength = sizeof(security);
ConvertStringSecurityDescriptorToSecurityDescriptor(
L"D:P(A;OICI;GA;;;SY)(A;OICI;GA;;;BA)(A;OICI;GR;;;IU)",
SDDL_REVISION_1,
&security.lpSecurityDescriptor,
NULL);

As You see, SDDL string contains human readable form of ACLs
which are rather obvious and doesn't need to explain.
Fabulous and easy form to operate on ACL...

- I'm trying to understand the difference, and benefits of using System.out.println() vs. return blah in a method.
- You're comparing potatoes with solar beams, and you're getting purple unicorns flying around stonehenge waiting for a meteor bringing back dinosaurs.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25456472/differences-between-system-out-printlin-and-return-in-java